QUARTERBACKING: IS IT TIME TO PICK UP THE GUN??

Now again we have concrete evidence that police make up stories to justify their outright murder of men of African descent.

 Quaterbacking is what I call this act of lying by police and it is taken from a scene in the movie "Training Days." In this scene Denzel along with some other police officers torture, rob and kill a big drug dealer. Once the operation is completed Denzel jumps into an easy chair and says “now let me quarterback this thing.” By quarterback he meant to make up a lie to tell to his superiors and the public about how this killing went down so the lie will look like the truth. This is how this scene relates to the killing of Walter Scott.

Initially when Officer Michael Slager killed Walter Scott the officer made up the lie that he was struggling with Walter, Walter had taken his Taser, the officer feared for his life, so his fear justified the taking of Walter’s life. In the movie we had the benefit of knowing that the cops were lying. In real life the quarterbacking scene is most times not there. But in the murder of Walter we are privileged to see Officer Slager doing the quarterbacking. There is a video.

Now this video raises all kinds of questions and reveals all kinds of truths. Let me deal with some questions first:

  • ·         How many police officers are patrolling our communities and actually patrolling for the opportunity to kill instead of protect?
  • ·         How high is the percentage of police officers who actually cover up murder as a justified police action shooting? (Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, Michael Brown, Michael Taylor, Walter Scott, etc.)
  • ·         How high is the percentage of officer who knows of this quarterbacking but keep quiet and just go along with this deadly game?

Here are some revelations:

  • ·         Just because a police officer said it does not make it true. Police officers lie as a course of their normal duties
  • ·         Society wants to say overwhelmingly that most cops are good but these so-called good cops are co-conspirators in helping the bad cops cover the truth and create plausible lies. The video of Walter’s murder clearly highlights this fact.
  • ·         Police in our communities are not serving and protecting they are instead killing and rejecting our right to life with the help of the so-called good cops!!
  • ·         The person that shot the video of Walter Scott’s murder has publically stated that at no time did he see a struggle over the officer’s Taser. The struggle over the Taser is at the foundation of Slager’s made up story to quarterback his murder of Walter.
  • ·         Several officers in their reports say they performed or saw CPR performed on Walter. The video shows no evidence of this being the case. This means the officers gathered around to watch Walter die. Yet they in conjunction with each other quarterbacked a story that makes them appear humane when the reality of the video shows their reports are far from being the truth. These are so-called good cops helping to concoct a lie in support of the murder by the bad cop. They are not good cops!! This so-called good cops are bad cops too!!  And this video shows it is the norm for police behavior.

I could go on and on about truths being revealed. However I am going to conclude with raising one more issue. The death of Officer Perry Renn is also being quarterbacked. Major Davis’ lawyers have evidence from the Marion County Coroner that precisely states that the metal fragments that killed Renn did not come from bullets. That means the bullets that Major is accused of shooting could not have, and did not kill this officer. This quarterbacking is more tragic because Major’s attorneys are part of the team that is doing the quarterbacking.


Here’s my conclusion: I would suggest at this point that you buckle up!  The following is a link that gives an excellent analysis of Indiana’s stand your ground law as applied for a defense for Major. (Major Davis probable cause affidavit with analysis for “Stand Your Ground” Defense)

Here's what Indiana's Stand Your Ground Law says:

(i)                  A person is justified in using reasonable force against a public servant if the person reasonably believes the force is necessary to: (1) protect the person or a third person from what the person reasonably believes to be the imminent use of unlawful force;

According to the law and with what we know now, the person who shot this video would have been within the law of Indiana if he had shot and killed Officer Slager before Slager could have murdered Walter. Slager was using unlawful force which is the reason he now sits in jail facing murder charges. Any citizen exercising this legal right would have saved Walter’s life and been justified for taking Officer Slager’s. Is it time for citizens to demand police have body cams while we have our own cameras along with our own gun so when we experience a cop unlawfully using deadly force that we can lawfully use deadly force and stop the officer from breaking the law? You know what my answer is. Do you have the courage to share yours? If so please do. YOU READY?


Quarterbacking: Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department Release The Video!

At the news conference Chief Hite revealed that they have recovered two videoes of the killing of Mack (Julius) Long. If IMPD does not release the video then I say it is a sign that they are quarterbacking the killing of Jilius. They are in the back room making up a story to justify the unjustified killing of our brother. I am calling on the release of the video now!! Don't tell us the investigation stops the release of the video. Don't tell us that it is the job of the prosecutor to release the video. We don't care whose job it is we just want them to realease the video. Transparentcy is the verification of honesty. The release of the videoes should be immediated!!!! Wouldn't you agree?



Posted on Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 09:45AM by Registered CommenterRev. Ajabu | Comments3 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (3)

I was just on the radio program "Legally Speaking" with Nathaniel Lee​. We talked about a citizen having the right to use deadly force against a police officer that was using force to accomplish an illegal arrest. It just so happens that Chief Hite came on the program following Nate and he confirmed that a citizen has the right to kill a police officer if necessary to stop the officer from illegally arresting you or someone else. I am learning with each passing day that we think just because a person is a lawyer they know all the law. Nothing could be further from the truth. They know some law, but no one knows all the laws, including a judge! So just because a lawyer speaks about the law does not mean he knows the law of which he/she is speaking. Here is the law concerning your right as a citizen to kill a police officer if the police officer is illegally trying to arrest you.

“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”
“An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.” Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.
“When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified.” Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.
“These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.” Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
“Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
“One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
“Story affirmed the right of self-defense by persons held illegally. In his own writings, he had admitted that ‘a situation could arise in which the checks-and-balances principle ceased to work and the various branches of government concurred in a gross usurpation.’ There would be no usual remedy by changing the law or passing an amendment to the Constitution, should the oppressed party be a minority. Story concluded, ‘If there be any remedy at all ... it is a remedy never provided for by human institutions.’ That was the ‘ultimate right of all human beings in extreme cases to resist oppression, and to apply force against ruinous injustice.’” (From Mutiny on the Amistad by Howard Jones, Oxford University Press, 1987, an account of the reading of the decision in the case by Justice Joseph Story of the Supreme Court.

April 11, 2015 | Registered CommenterRev. Ajabu

This goes on all the time. I have been confronting this behavior for 42 years personally and a victim to it and I have been in the struggle for others since I was 9 years old. I have been so much more exposed to this as a eye witness. I have seen men killed by law enforcement and hung by the neck until death in the Marion County Jail. I call to mind the viscious assault of Jane Harrington a anchor on wthr channel 13 by a police officer. The little 9 year old boy on 38th and Keystone that was shot down by a police over a 25 cent bag of chips and killed him. What about the little Black girl that was killed by a white police because he mistook her for a dog around 30th and played his way out of it. Now this case sheds light on exactly what happened to Michael Brown. My thought are focused on the officer's mother's comments. His mother is devastated and she is making no excuses for him. She knows what was in her son's heart because she knows what is in hers as a mother. She knows the danger he has placed her family in. She knows the dark cloud he has brought to police there and abroad. We also know the light this has brought to the public. I was handcuffed and beaten un- conscious by 13 white deputies while in hand cuffs and I simply was speaking out against a murder of a white prisoner that had killed by tossing that old man from cop to cop until he died. 13 white deputies and they were pronouncing me dead the next day when I miraculously came back and the the Wishard Hospital records has the record of that assault. Then these Black police have enough nerve to speak of me having mental issues. I have every right to claim everything on the mental menu. You try living under that severity of that level of abuse. They even threatened to kill every prisoner if they told what happened. This is a serious matter. I am tired and this kind of trauma is having a serious effect on me. I want to file a law suit for emotional damage about all of these police killings. I have had a police that came to my house with the intent to kill me for fighting against a drug lord and gang. It was Black officer that pulled me out of this white police's path because got out of control and stomped up the step to assault me and Officer Rumph, a Black officer moved me up on my porch because that had made his mind up he was going to kill him a nigger right in the heart of Haughville. He almost knocked the Black police down. I had another white police come to take a report here at my house where I live now and he came to my back door and I opened the door and he unbottoned his holster and stood back off of me. i asked him to come so I would not have to yell all of my personal business out and he stated; Oh I am fine right here. Why was he at my back door? Why was he hiding beside my house. Why was he ready to kill?? I wasn't upset. Ijjst needed a report. He left without the report. They made him come back and he still refused to give the report. None of the other police ever came to my rear door. Just anybody he Black that he could kill that day would do. Look at the Balck veteran they went in that 74 year old Black man's home for a welfare check and kicked in his back door and surprized him and he not knowing they immediately shot and killed him. This was the same state where this police killed Walter Scott in cold blood. They had no business kicking in his door without a warrant. This has to be addressed immediately.


This is serious stuff!

April 15, 2015 | Unregistered CommenterRev Ajabu

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>