Intro4.png

Ajabu's Reflections: IN THE NAME OF THE FATHER »

Barack's Senate Seat And Politics

I am confused. Maybe my astute readers can help me. I was always taught that “compromise” was the art of politics. Wikipedia says compromise is “a settlement of a dispute in which two or more sides agree to accept less than they originally wanted.” Wikipedia goes on to say that a compromise is “something accepted rather than wanted: something that somebody accepts because what was wanted is unattainable.” Compromise has been around for quite a long time. For example, The Compromise of 1850 was a series of bills aimed at resolving the territorial and slavery controversies arising from the Mexican-American War (1846–1848). There were five laws which balanced the interests of the slave states of the South and the free states to the north. California was admitted as a free state; Texas received financial compensation for relinquishing claim to lands west of the Rio Grande in what is now New Mexico; the Territory of New Mexico (including present-day Arizona and a portion of southern Nevada) was organized without any specific prohibition of slavery; the slave trade (but not slavery itself) was terminated in the District of Columbia; and the stringent Fugitive Slave Law was passed, requiring all U.S. citizens to assist in the return of runaway slaves regardless of the legality of slavery in the specific states

 

Wasn't Rod Blagojevich, Governor of Illinois taking part in the art of compromise when he was entertaining different people's quest to be appointed to Senator Barack Obama's senate seat? Some would say the governor was dabbling in the art of compromise but pushing a quid pro quo agenda. What is quid pro quo. Wikipedia defines “quid pro quo” as “the concept of getting something of value in return for giving something of value.” Legally “for a contract to be binding, it usually must involve the exchange of something of value.” When Blagojevich appoints someone to take Obama's seat has there not in essence been a contract between the governor and who ever is appointed? Has not there been an exchange of something of value?

 

Again Wikipedia defines quid pro quo as “the concept of getting something of value in return for giving something of value. Wasn't Blagojevich trying to do the same thing that Texas did when it received “compensation for relinquishing claim to lands west of the Rio Grande in what is now New Mexico?" For a contract to be binding, it usually must involve the exchange of something of value.” A contract is “an exchange of promises between two or more parties to do or refrain from doing an act which is enforceable in a court of law. By law Blagojevich, as governor of Illinois is dictated to appoint the successor to Obama's seat. Was Jesse Jackson Jr. wrong to try to make a deal to get the appointment? Isn't it the regular order of business for politicians to make deals? Isn't deal making the ultimate expression of politics? Don't politicians compromise in order to make the deal? Where did Blagojevich cross the line? To me, it looks like he was doing what politicians do. Y'all help me please. We must continue to increase the love and decrease the hate.

Posted on Monday, December 15, 2008 at 10:24AM by Registered CommenterRev. Ajabu | Comments13 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (13)

The governor wanted them to BUY the senate seat--to enrich himself. You may like so called deals but it is illegal. I prefer to elect my senators. What is this in Illinois an elected mafia?

December 15, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterinterested observer

Deals are made every day. That's politics. The deal normally enriches the deal maker even though they make us think the deal was in the interest of the people. This is politics.

December 15, 2008 | Registered CommenterRev. Ajabu

The two main reasons this has become such a big deal are:

1. He got caught in a criminal investigation of the U.S. Attorney's office (which, by the way, the Obama transition people may well have put them up to -- or possibly Mayor Daley)

2. His race.

I still think there is much more to be revealed -- like for instance, the internal audit documents that the U.S. Attorney's office explicitly asked them not to make public until next week? Why could that be?

Stay tuned, film at eleven.

D

December 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDavid

This is getting crazy. What Blago did was OK because that is what politicians do? What he did was ILLEGAL, period. No if's and's or buts. You can't make excuses for anyone involved in this, J. Jackson (Jr. or Sr.) Obama or anyone. From the start of Obama's run I have been warning people with two words..."Chicago politician"......I guess I was right all along.

December 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterJon G

I just want to know where is the line? The Illinois governor did what politicians do every day. At what point does it become illegal.

December 16, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterRev. Ajabu

Jon G,

Harry Reid just called David Patterson, the governor of New York to say he wants Carolyn Kennedy to take Hillary Clinton's Senate seat. Is this not the same thing that Jesse Jackson did, or Barack Obama's campaign did? Would Patterson's be breaking the law if he inquired how appointing Carolyn would be a benefit to New York and himself? Where is the line? I am trying to understand when to make a deal becomes illegal.

Interested Observer:

I can understand that you would like to elect your senator. However, by law, in this situation, it is the governor's charge to replace a person in both Barack and Hillary's senate seats. I am just trying to understand when the deal makers are crossing the law when they are doing what they do every day. Where is the line?

December 16, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterRev. Ajabu

Here's my take, for what it's worth:

From today's New York Times we know that Fitzgerald's case against Blagojevich is weak. The reason for this is that he essentially moved in too early. No actions have been taken. No money changed hands.

The questions is, why did Fitz move in early? Ostensibly, he moved in because the day before the Chicago Tribune ran a story that Blagojevich had been wire-tapped, blowing their cover.

But this leads to another question: why did the Tribune run the story? Answer: someone in Fitz's office tipped them off.

This then leads to another question: why did Fitz's office tip off the Tribune?

I see two possible answers here, neither very pretty.

1) Early on when the scandal broke, the New York Times ran a story indicating that Rahm Emmanual had been in talks with Blagojevich over the Senate Seat. If we assume that Obama's team did not know of the wire tapping, Fitz could have been very afraid that Emmanual or someone else was about to say or do something "over the line" so to speak. Given that this would have been recorded, it could have been disasterous for President Elect Obama before he had even taken office. Fitz needed cover to go in early before this could happen, so he had his office tip off the Tribune.

2) If we assume that Obama knew about the wire-tapping, he could have instructed Fitz's team to go in early exactly so there would be a weak case against Blagojevich. Fitz still needed cover for this, though, so the same tip-off applies.

My personal opinion is 1. If I'm right, Obama owes a debt of gratitude to Fitz for essentially taking a fall for him. And it will probably be a big fall. Fitz's career will be over for all real purposes.

There is really no case against the Governor. Everybody knows this which is why the Illinois Legislature is basically delaying any impeachment proceedings. They know that Fitz's prosecution will fail, and that there will be hell to pay when Blagojevich is vindicated.

One man's opinion.

December 16, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterNeal Jettpace

Neal,

You may not be far from the truth. Now we find out that Jesse Jackson Jr. was a snitch for Fitzegerald!! Therefore, Jesse Jr. probably knew that Blagojevich was being taped. Now, if people who were alledgely speaking on behalf of Jesse jr, offered a million dollars so Jesse Jr. would be appointed to Barack's senate seat, there is a case that could be made that Jesse's people were trying to entrap the governor. Lord have mercy!!! In what times do we really live?

December 17, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterRev. Ajabu

It was nice to see that Jesse Jackson Jr. went right to the feds after Blagojevich tried to shake him down. This just goes to show that there are honest Chicago politicians, Obama included.

The hopes of the entire world rest upon Obama's shoulders. We are facing a world financial crisis of a scope not seen since the 1930's. As well, he is perhaps the only world leader with both the intellect and legitimacy to navigate a peace between western and Islamic interests. I'm sure no one understands weight of this more than he himself does.

The Quakers have a doctrine of "way will open." In short it means that when difficult times set in, God will open a way through them. I truly believe that Obama is the "open way" for these times.

Let us pray that God will strengthen his shoulders and grant him wisdom for the tasks ahead.

December 17, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterNeal Jettpace

I thought I would relate a quick Obama anecdote that involved my oldest son, Wiley.

Early on in the Democratic Primary, Obama made an unannounced Sunday morning visit to St. Lukes Methodist Church on 86th street. A friend of ours got word about it prior enough to take her children and Wiley to the service.

When the service ended, she and her three children got in line to, and succeded in shaking his hand. Wiley was next in line. Before Wiley could shake his hand, a very elderly African American woman (we are white)scooted in before him and was the last.

At first Wiley was disappointed. I told him, however, that that woman had probably been waiting her entire life for an event like this to happen. In fact, she probably thought that she would wait in vain. And she was not alone. Entire generations, of all colors, had been waiting for this.

I said, Wiley you are more blessed by getting to witness this woman shake Senator Obama's hand than if you had shaken his hand yourself.

He understood.

December 17, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterNeal Jettpace

Neal,

Your story concerning your son Wiley is very moving. I am surprised that this experience took place knowing that very few Blacks, besides Marion Miller, attend St. Lukes. You definitely handled it in a Christian way. I don't know if you know it or not, but your Pastor, Kent Millard, publicly shared a story concerning Barack's visit to St. Luke. He said he received several phone calls from members who did not want Barack at the church. In fact, a large donor, $250,000 withdrew the commitment because of Barack's visit. I pray that your spirit becomes contagious.

You are right in that Barack has an enormous job ahead of him. And I too believe that he was divinely chosen to lead the way. It is our job to make sure he does not stray from the straight and narrow. May God continue to order our steps.

December 17, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterRev. Ajabu

In the case of Blagojevich seeking to sell the senate seat this is politics as it has always been. It throws me how history is still so very prevalent and some behave as if because it is the 21st century governmental arenas have taken on a new shape. While a new day has come it has not yet been enacted just put into position. In my personal opinion what the governor of Ill. has done is illegal however it is not based on the what but how and his motive. Like it or not, anything initiated by anyone for one's own preservation is unethical and unrighteous. Nonetheless this is justice as we know it from the onset of the Constitution and Amendments put in place over 300 years ago. In reference to bBrack and his position or the lack thereof concernig this matter, incidents taking place that seek to destroy his character are right on target. One of the evidences of a person fulfilling their purposes as a result of helping to restore on any level is chaos all around them. It is the behavior of one who is chosen that determines the rise or continued failing of a system. In essence I can appreciate the confusion, ignorance and exposure of evil hearts during this time in our government much more today; anyone who has ears let him hear. For me it all says no matter what economic state, political or judicial deceptions, the end for all games is over and the world is runnig scared. I would be too if I had been apart of a system that held down values which degraded, dehumanized and literally bullied others out of their freedoms and right to be human. I concur with many who understand you reap what you sow, except on at a higher degress. Things always seem worse before they get better. This is when the power of God is seen in ways that no one can deny the existence of Jesus Christ. To God be the glory.

December 17, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterLuWanna Jennings

Now that the Illinois Governor has chosen a Black former District Attorney to replace Obama, what do you think should happen?

I think the Democrats in the Senate and House need to calm down and accept the Governor's choice. They did not prosecute Bagloyevich and he is still legally entitled to choose a replacement for Barack and he did that.

Once the legal process is finished and the Governor is found guilty of a crime that is unrelated to his choice, then let him serve whatever time is required. His choice of the person to replace Barack should have no bearing on the governor's case.

I think Barack has enough to deal with rather than become embroiled in some Illinois politics that can hurt us all as a major distraction from the economy and the problems of the world.

Pastor, I may have introduced something that should have been your call. I just did not have any more to contribute to the current discussion of this blog. I apologize if I have commited and error.

john marshall

January 1, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterjohn marshall

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>