WILL THE MAYOR HONOR THE LAW? Part 2
Buckle up!! This is going to be a rough ride. In a letter dated August 7, 2010 I requested from the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department the following in lieu of the Public Records Act Of Indiana:
Request all recorded video of the following for July 17, 2010:
- · Maryland and Illinois street from 9pm to 10pm
- · Maryland and Meridian Streets from 9pm to 10pm
- · Illinois and market Streets to include but not limited to the camera videl on the stop light at this intersection from 11pm to 12 midnight
This request was sent to Samantha Karn, who is the Corporation Counselor for the city of Indianapolis. Today, September 20, 2010 I received the letter pasted below:
|
|
Paul R. Ciesielski, Chief of Police
50 North Alabama Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
Indianapolis Metropolitan
Police Department
City Of Indianapolis
September 15,2010
Mmoja Ajabu
620 Union Drive, Room 244
Indianapolis, IN 46202
Re: Public Records Request
Dear Mr. Ajabu:
IMPD has received your public records request for recorded video from different intersections. Unfortunately, we are unable to fulfill this request due to IMPD keeps video only for thirty (30) days. Should you require further assistance, please feel free to contact me at (317) 327-7638.
Sincerely,
Lea A. Gurnell Legal Assistant Indianapolis police Department
Now who in their right mind would believe that the police has destroyed evidence that is pertinent in a criminal case. The video I requested should show the shootings that took place during the time that the Indiana Black Expo Summer Celebration was going on in downtown Indianapolis. Public Safety Director, Frank Straub has said publicly that the IMPD has the shooter and the shootings on video
http://www.wishtv.com/dpp/news/local/marion_county/straub-we-have-the-shooter-on-film
For the IMPD to destroy this video would be tampering with evidence and a crime in the state of Indiana. This appears to be another cover up. I say another because Chief Ciesielsk said that two of the officers that beat Brandon Johnson
were justified in beating him because he resisted arrest. Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi ruled that Brandon, nor his brother, exhibited behavior that rose to the level of being a crime. To say that officers was justified for being Brandon is a cover up by Chief Paul Ciesielske to protect the criminal behavior of IMPD officers.
Again the reason why I say cover up is when Officer Bisard ran over three motorcyclists killing one and critically injuring the other two to include Kurt Weekly
who is in and out of consciousness. Officer Bisard was found to have drank so much alcohol that is blood to alcohol content was over more than twice the legal limit. Officers who are supposed to be experts at determining when a person is impaired testified that they did not notice that Officer Bisard was drunk. This is no more than a cover up.
Now we have Chief of Police Paul R. Ciesielski’s office telling me that his office has destroyed taped that would be used in the criminal investigation of a young black male, SHAMUS PATTON
accused of shooting nine people in downtown Indianapolis. This behavior by the police makes me more confident that it was the police that actually did the shooting of those young black males. I initially was skeptical when I found out that Shamus was accused of firing nine (9) shots hitting eight (8) people. Then he supposedly walked a block and fired six (6) more shots hitting one person another black male under the age of 17. All these victims shot in the leg. When did these young black males who are out here shooting start shooting each other in the leg? My skepticism rose when I found out that all the rounds recovered from the two scenes were fort (40) caliber shells. Humm! The forty (40) caliber is the standard issued weapon of the IMPD. What? By coincidence Shamus chose to use the same weapon that is issued to the police? Then when I found out that in the very midst of three hundred (300) police officers in the immediate vicinity he was supposedly able to escape from downtown I said hold up, wait a minute. Something in the coal and black. This oder don't smell right. Then I started putting two and two together. I know what I saw with my own eyes at Illinois and Market on July 17, 2010. I am confident that it was a police officer that shot the youth again in the leg as all the others were shot. The corruption of the IMPD is being exposed by the above letter. With the Mayor not cleaning the department he becomes complicit in the corruption along with Public Safety Director Frank Straub and Police Chief Ciesielski. Commander Karen Arnett also has to be implicated. How do these shooting take place in the area under her control and she doesn't know what is going on? Karen you need to step up and tell the public the truth. If it proves true as it appears that the police are actually the one's that shot these young black males to cover up the beating of Brandon Johnson then what should be the response of the citizens of Indianapolis? Would it be time for a real tea party? Could it be that democracy has been suspended? Where is the government of the people, by the people, for the people? Looks like we have a government that is preying on the people and not praying for its people. Indianapolis citizens are living in a police state and we don’t even know it. Lord help us today.
People tried to make me seem to be irresponsible because I had the nerve to publicly state what I saw. People who I dearly respect have stated to me personally that they no longer want to be associated with the truth I am telling. Well let it be known that all the words written on this blog for in the past, for now, and forever in the future are mine and no one else’s!! I am my own man with my own mouth speaking my own words. Thank you for listening to AjabuSpeaks.
Rev. Ajabu
6 Comments
View Printer Friendly Version
Email Article to Friend
Reader Comments (6)
This is pure, unadulterated bullshit for so many reasons.
Thirty days had not passed when you made the request.
If the police dept. destroys evidence in criminal cases within 30 days, how do they ever manage to convict anybody of anything?
This convinces me that the criminals in this case are the police; otherwise they would be trumpeting their "evidence" all over the place.
And you may quote me.
Janet
"If it's morally right, it can't be politically wrong." Jesse Jackson
http://janetcheathambell.com/
http://agingrace.blogspot.com/
Yes sir. We have been under martial law since 1860.
JEAN KEATING'S PRISON TREATISE
November 30, 2004
The courts are operating under Statute Law. A "Statute" is defined in Black's Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition revised as a kind of bond or obligation of record, being an abbreviation for "statute merchant" or "statute staple".
Statute-merchant = is defined as a security for a debt acknowledged to be due, entered into before the chief magistrate of some trading town, pursuant to the statute 13 Edward I. De Mercatoribus, by which not only the body of the debtor might be imprisoned, and his goods seized in satisfaction of the debt, but also his lands might be delivered to the creditor till out of the rents and profits of them the debt be satisfied. This was also called a Pocket Judgment.
Statute Staple = A 1353 statute establishing procedure for settling disputes among merchants who traded in staple towns. The statute helped merchants receive swift judgment for debt. Cf. STATUTE MERCHANT. 2. A bond for commercial debt. A statute staple gave the lender a possessory right in the land of a debtor who failed to repay a loan. See STAPLE.
"A popular form of security after 1285 . . . was the . . . 'statute staple' - whereby the borrower could by means of a registered contract charge his land and goods without giving up possession; if he failed to pay, the lender became a tenant of the land until satisfied . . . the borrower under a statue or recognizance remained in possession of his land, and it later became a common practice under the common-law forms of mortgage likewise to allow the mortgagor to remain in possession as a tenant at will or at sufferance of the mortgage." J.H. Baker, An introduction to English Legal History 354 (3d edition 1990).
Recognizance = A bond or obligation of record binding a person to some act as to appear in court and subject to forfeit money if obligation is not fulfilled. Fifa = Fifa, short for the Latin phrase fieri facias ("let it be made . . .") was a court (execution) to the sheriff to levy on ([a] Take of) the property of a debtor in order to satisfy a judgment (see judgment and execution dockets, above). The sheriff might typically keep track of fifas in a Sheriff's Fifa Docket Book. Usually written on a fill-in-the blank form, a fifa names the parties to the court judgment and the value of property to be taken to satisfy the judgment. On the back, the sheriff or his deputies annotate their actions in carrying out the order. The fifas were to be returned to the court which issued them and the actions annotated on the Judgment Docket. Theoretically, the docket books should contain everything that was noted on the fifas.
I have been doing more research on our prison system via the internet and have found out some interesting things, regarding what is really going on in the courtroom. The court is looking for an acceptance and acceptor under 3-410 of the U.C.C. as the Principal has the primary obligation to pay or discharge any instrument presented for acceptance. Since they are presenting a Bill of Exchange [indictment] for acceptance. This is called an acceptance for honor, which involves a negotiable instrument especially a bill of exchange [indictment] that has been accepted for payment. The complaint, information, or indictment is a three party Draft, Commercial paper, or Bill of Exchange under Article 3 of the U.C.C. The Grand Jury Foreman is the Drawer or Maker of the Indictment by his signature, the Defendant/ Debtor or Straw man is the Drawee and the State is the Payee and the live man is the Payor. What they are doing in the courtroom is all commercial, this is in conformity to Title 27 CFR.
(a) Presentment for acceptance is necessary to charge the drawer and endorsers of a draft where the draft so provides, or is payable elsewhere than at the residence or place of business of the Drawee, or its date of payment depends upon such presentment. The holder may at his option present for acceptance any other draft payable at a stated date;
http://www.freedom-school.com/keating/jean-keating-prison-treatise.html
YouTube - Camp FEMA: American Lockdown Part 1
Oct 20, 2009 ... Watch Camp FEMA Online or Get Your DVD - http://www.campfema.com - Part 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pY0XuUBuDvw.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=5h54OIM-Jn8 - Cached - Similar YouTube - Camp FEMA American Lockdown part 4
Apr 28, 2010 ... queue Camp FEMA part 4by SonnyDelight55683 views ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uIv09u7OOI
YouTube - Alex Jones' FEMA CAMPS AUTHORIZED 1/4
queue Alex Jones at the DNC FEMA Camp 25-AUG-2008 Pt.1by T4L0NNL12424 views ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeRnTr1Vvp0
illahea e3d3fd1842 https://www.jamiihuru.com/compdistcoolse
illahea e3d3fd1842 https://www.jamiihuru.com/compdistcoolse
illahea e3d3fd1842 https://www.jamiihuru.com/compdistcoolse
illahea e3d3fd1842 https://www.jamiihuru.com/compdistcoolse